Beyond Vercel: Why AWS?
While Vercel provides an excellent deployment experience for Next.js, there are scenarios where AWS gives you more control:
- Cost optimization at scale
- Custom infrastructure requirements
- Compliance and data residency
- Integration with existing AWS services
Architecture Overview
Our production setup includes:
- AWS Amplify or ECS Fargate for the Next.js application
- CloudFront CDN for static assets and edge caching
- Route 53 for DNS management
- ACM for SSL certificates
- CloudWatch for monitoring and logging
- GitHub Actions for CI/CD
Step 1: Containerize Your Next.js App
FROM node:20-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci
COPY . .
RUN npm run build
FROM node:20-alpine AS runner
WORKDIR /app
ENV NODE_ENV=production
COPY --from=builder /app/next.config.js ./
COPY --from=builder /app/public ./public
COPY --from=builder /app/.next/standalone ./
COPY --from=builder /app/.next/static ./.next/static
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["node", "server.js"]
Step 2: Set Up ECS Fargate
Create a task definition with appropriate CPU and memory allocation. For most portfolio and blog sites, 0.25 vCPU and 512MB RAM is sufficient.
Step 3: Configure CloudFront
CloudFront serves as your CDN, caching static assets at edge locations worldwide:
- Cache
/_next/static/with long TTL (1 year) - Pass through API routes and SSR pages
- Enable Gzip and Brotli compression
Step 4: CI/CD with GitHub Actions
name: Deploy to AWS
on:
push:
branches: [main]
jobs:
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: 20
- run: npm ci
- run: npm run build
- run: npm test
# Deploy to ECS...
Step 5: Monitoring
Set up CloudWatch alarms for:
- Response time > 3 seconds
- Error rate > 1%
- CPU utilization > 80%
- Memory utilization > 85%
Cost Breakdown
For a typical portfolio/blog with moderate traffic:
| Service | Monthly Cost | |---------|-------------| | ECS Fargate | ~$15 | | CloudFront | ~$5 | | Route 53 | ~$1 | | CloudWatch | ~$3 | | Total | ~$24/month |
This is comparable to Vercel's Pro plan but with significantly more control and scalability options.
Conclusion
AWS deployment requires more initial setup than Vercel, but the flexibility and cost efficiency at scale make it worthwhile for production applications. Start simple with Amplify for smaller projects, and graduate to ECS + CloudFront as your needs grow.